This paper demonstrates that smokers generally do not have the right to smoke in public places, in a wide variety of cases, because it is inconsistent with their duty to respect the right of others to be free from harm. Following such steps will help you write a powerful and successful essay.
They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. The underlying aim of this paper is to provide a moral guide to the formation of a public policy toward smoking behavior.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? We must therefore be very careful to examine specific features of the situations in which this offense arises; only in this way will we be able to determine if annoyance is sufficient to militate against the moral right to smoke.
The claims that second hand smoke leads to serious health problems must be the strong focus. Some people are addicted to smoking, and they cannot be isolated from non-smokers.
Governments raise enormous amounts of tax on cigarette sales, hundreds of thousands of people work in the cigarette industry directly and millions indirectly. This is a controversial issue, one that has immediate implications for public policy regarding smoking.
On the condition that they are causing harm, the smokers are obliged to refrain from smoking, and this remains true even if those doing the harm are unaware of the harm they are causing.
There are at least three levels on which smoking may harm nonsmokers. Since both the smokers and the nonsmokers have equal right to be present in the room, the nonsmokers stand to smokers as victims stand to those who shoot them. The nonsmoking homeowner has the ethical and legal right to stipulate policy in his or her home, and an offender should not be allowed to exert pressure, knowingly or otherwise, on the homeowner.
Why engage in an activity that will ruin your health and perhaps eventually kill you? The paper will at the end explore several policy considerations that might lead to the elimination of exposure to secondhand smoke.
In addition, you must back legal arguments using the legal framework in existence in good detail. In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places.
This point is crucial in determining an appropriate policy when the interests of smokers and nonsmokers conflict. If one is sufficiently annoyed at the presence of secondhand smoke, then it might very well be a moral issue, and it is hard to see how the smoker is in a position to challenge this.
In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. Generalizations of the laws and their background will not be strong enough. The first involves the distasteful odor of cigarette smoke, in the air and in the clothes and hair of even nonsmokers, who are in the same room as a smoker, let us call this the level of annoyance.
The writer needs to read extensively relevant materials that explain what the law of the land is regarding smoking. It is emotive, and controversial. At each of these three levels we must determine whether the harm is sufficiently significant and determine if the right to smoke should be curtailed.
If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. The non-smokers have actively placed themselves in the room, presumably, but they have not actively done anything to the smokers in the way that the smokers have actively done something to them.
These roots are primarily based in health concerns.For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones. The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad and.
Essay on It's Time to Ban Smoking in Public Places - According to published research, an estimated 1, Americans die each day from a smoking related illness. Smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in the US (Bilofsky, 1).
Then a variety of arguments for smoking in public places presented. The underlying aim of this paper is to provide a moral guide to the formation of a public policy toward smoking behavior.
Such a policy, paper will argue, is likely to have as its consequence the elimination. Smoking Ban - Smoking In Public Places Essay - Smoking Ban Argument Have you ever been in your favorite restaurant and just as you are about to take a bite of your favorite dish, your lungs are filled with a cloud of smoke which has drifted to your table from the smoking section just a few feet away.
This is a common complaint of many patrons. Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Words | 4 Pages. More about Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places Essays. Essay about Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Words | 5 Pages; Smoking in Public Buildings Should Be Banned.
Keywords: smoking ban essay, public smoking essay. The numbers of people who smoke have increase over the years. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke. Therefore smoking should be banned in all public places.
People who smoke in public portray a bad example. Children are.Download